As fall is now here, the lawn signs have sprouted indicating it’s time for another round of Common Council elections. While many have been disappointed by the candidates at the national or state level, we are fortunate in Summit to have great candidates willing to serve our town as council members.
While the political process even at the local level requires the candidates to affiliate with one of the parties, I think most would agree that we and the candidates all want to be able to preserve the special qualities that we love about our town while minimizing tax increases. Beth has forward thinking ideas on how to limit tax increases. As a financial professional, I believe she has the knowledge to make decisions for Summit that will improve on what we have and propel us forward in a better way..
The world is changing all around us and we need a council that will think beyond just the oversight of day-to-day services and annual budgets. We need leadership that will think about the future and be proactive about how Summit can evolve and grow to always be a top choice for future generations of families to move and live.
Beth Little has the ability to think outside the box and take a longer term perspective while staying on top of the day to day. She has proven time and again that she will devote her full attention as needed to focus on major issues as they come up. All the candidates are very qualified, but Beth Little has my vote because I know she’ll be able to do more than just maintain what we have. We will all benefit with her voice on council.
Yon Cho
As Mayor of Summit, I am keenly aware that embracing the future is the only way to ensure that we can withstand the challenges of the present. We live in a pivotal time. Communities that take a “do no harm” approach will find themselves falling behind. This is why I am endorsing Beth Little, Marjorie Fox, and Matt Gould for Common Council. These candidates are problem-solvers. They understand our changing economy and they have the skills and creative ideas to unlock its potential.
In addition, they have the sound judgment that is a keystone to effective governing. They understand the rules of civil society and know that those rules apply to all of us equally. They will be strong collaborators who will demonstrate thoughtful concern for all our residents, not simply those who support their candidacy.
I have known Beth Little for over 12 years and have watched her put tremendous effort into everything she does. As a fellow board member of the Summit Educational Foundation, Beth brought her knowledge of the community and the needs of students across the entire spectrum of the district to the board. Her insights were often essential to our decision-making process.
When faced with complex problems, Beth relies upon her prosecutorial skills to research issues and fully inform herself. Once she has the information she needs Beth works tirelessly to solve those issues. She has worked with people from all over town as a board member at The Connection, a leader of the Santa Claus Shop, and a coordinator of sports teams. Beth is an experienced leader in Summit with the judgment and integrity to be an effective leader on Common Council.
Nora G. Radest
It’s been said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Watching how Summit’s Republican controlled Common Council has been operating on that principle, particularly as it pertains to a failure to stabilize property taxes compounded by questionable spending of Summit homeowner’s property tax dollars, is what is driving candidates Marjorie Fox, Matt Gould, and Beth Little to run for Common Council. If you’re looking for fiscally responsible candidates who are concerned about keeping Summit affordable, in part by stabilizing homeowner property taxes and growing our commercial tax base, Fox, Gould and Little are the only choice.
That is why Jim Bennett’s October 12 letter to TAP is particularly irksome. He states that the Republican candidates for Common Council are magically more capable of stabilizing property taxes while offering little other than Mr. Dietze’s membership on the Board of School estimate to support that claim. He claims that Fox, Gould, and Little’s record on property tax stabilization is uncertain. Evidently he hasn’t bothered to read their campaign literature beyond picking out one “minor” idea—the creation of a business concierge for downtown, which may already exist, and determines this to be a sign of fiscal malfeasance. Really? Based on our Common Council spending decisions, it’s the Republican Common Council members who have time and again shown fiscal malfeasance, voting to allocate money to hire consultants for parking studies that bear out what every Summit resident who has ever tried to park downtown between the hours of 12 p.m. and 2 p.m. could tell you is a challenge, or spending on new parking systems (I’ve lost count now how many) that are complicated to use. Of note, Mr. Wattick was the president of the Summit Taxpayers Association —where has he been while Council was voting on these outrageous and often redundant expenditures?
Fiscally responsible Democrats? In a word, YES. Each has called out the decision by Common Council to spend $300,000 on cobblestones to pave the Beechwood area business district. A decision that Summit’s downtown business owners are opposed, and our own public works department would attest to the added difficulty in clearing snow from cobble-stoned streets.
Those who attended the Summit Candidate’s Forum on October 12th heard the candidates address the unfair tax burden on Summit’s residents as it relates to our share of property taxes that go directly to Union County. This isn’t new and won’t be resolved by attending Union County Freeholder meetings to complain. Wattick’s proposed solution to losing our state and local tax deduction if Trump’s tax reform passes is to pressure Union County to lessen Summit’s tax burden. Good luck with that—where’s their incentive? Mayor Radest has been successful in bringing some of those taxpayer dollars back to Summit in the form of grants from Union County. Fox, Gould, and Little’s platform calls for actively seeking more funding from Union County. And, like it or not, Union County might feel more favorably toward a Summit Common Council that favors more Democratic representation.
The saying, “All politics is local,” has never been more resonant than what we are witnessing in 2017. On a local level it’s best to view policy from an “independent” lens and vote for candidates who balance needs vs. wants with an eye toward fiscal responsibility. For this reason, I am supporting the team of Fox, Gould, and Little for Summit’s Common Council.
Judith Knott
This November 7th Election Day, we will be voting for Beth Little (At-Large), Matt Gould (Ward 1), and encouraging our Ward 2 neighbors to vote for Marjorie Fox.
These three thoughtful, knowledgeable and accomplished citizen-volunteers represent the best in public service, and are selflessly running to serve Summit for all the right reasons. And, while we might not agree with everything they say - or haven’t said - like “take down those dreadful gates on the DeForest parking lots” (a personal pet peeve!), we do know they will listen to us, to all of us, and that their judgment will be based on sound and fair reasoning.
They will also be serving with a commitment to preserving the civility that has been a hallmark of our local government, but which we can no longer take for granted. Honesty, transparency, respectful debate, demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusiveness - are all essential to keeping Summit the ‘best small city in America'. We hope you agree.
Please Vote. See you at the polls where we will be continuing our 45-year tradition of serving as Challengers!
Phyllis and Lew Sank
Red v. Blue. Republican v. Democrat. Just about every one of us associates ourselves with one or the other. On a national level, I typically do too, however, on a local level I believe it doesn’t really apply.
When I look at who is running for mayor or common council, I think: “Do they have the best interest of Summit at the heart of their agenda?” Beth Little is that candidate that clearly has the best interest of Summit at the heart of her agenda, and not just for some, but for everyone.
Beth is running as a Democrat, but she has made it very clear that she wants to keep Summit affordable for everyone by NOT raising taxes and has laid out a plan to do just that.
In addition, Beth is committed to keeping our schools strong. Beth has focused on education through most of her volunteer work in Summit. In fact, I had the opportunity to see Beth’s great work with the Summit Educational Foundation and know that she will bring that experience to common council. It’s no secret that strong schools help raise every resident’s property value no matter your political affiliation.
All of Beth’s volunteer work since she moved to Summit, and there has been a lot, has been to improve this wonderful town in a completely selfless manner. I can’t think of a more honest, and capable person who has the utmost integrity to represent Summit families on town council.
Please join me in voting for Beth Little on Nov. 7th.
Betsy Macpherson
◄
1 / 1
►